- Posts: 1013
- Thank you received: 140
851 Axle Ratio Stamping
- Curt Schulze
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Registered
Less
More
11 Jun 2021 20:23 #43332
by Curt Schulze
The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
Be of Good Cheer
Curt
Replied by Curt Schulze on topic 851 Axle Ratio Stamping
That would be March 1935. It would be a late style diff. few parts interchange between early and late Most early style are 51-10's (sept 34 to feb 35)
There are at least four different ratios. Some had three gear planitaries .
Frank in Ohio has forgot more that I know on this subject.
There are at least four different ratios. Some had three gear planitaries .
Frank in Ohio has forgot more that I know on this subject.
The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
Be of Good Cheer
Curt
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jonathan Richards
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamesbartlett
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Registered
Less
More
- Posts: 23
- Thank you received: 1
11 Jun 2021 19:15 #43330
by jamesbartlett
'35 Auburn S/C Convert. Sedan
'32 Duesenberg D/C Phaeton
Replied by jamesbartlett on topic 851 Axle Ratio Stamping
Also, how much does the high range reduce the ratio? Is it a standard amount common to all the cars?
'35 Auburn S/C Convert. Sedan
'32 Duesenberg D/C Phaeton
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamesbartlett
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Registered
Less
More
- Posts: 23
- Thank you received: 1
11 Jun 2021 18:53 #43329
by jamesbartlett
'35 Auburn S/C Convert. Sedan
'32 Duesenberg D/C Phaeton
Replied by jamesbartlett on topic 851 Axle Ratio Stamping
I see a lot of numbers, but which one is relevant? Also, which photo is the early -- the top one? My car's differential is like the one at top. There is a casted-in number that appears to be E333.56. Above that is an upside-down stamping that appears to be 3x35.
'35 Auburn S/C Convert. Sedan
'32 Duesenberg D/C Phaeton
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Curt Schulze
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Registered
Less
More
- Posts: 1013
- Thank you received: 140
10 Jun 2021 15:50 #43322
by Curt Schulze
The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
Be of Good Cheer
Curt
Replied by Curt Schulze on topic 851 Axle Ratio Stamping
The picture shows the early and late style two speed rear differrentials. Few parts parts interchange. The early style was phased out in Feburary of 1935.
The picture . The info you request is stamped into the housing. The sixes and eights are the same EXCEPT for the size of the axel shafts.
The picture . The info you request is stamped into the housing. The sixes and eights are the same EXCEPT for the size of the axel shafts.
The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
Be of Good Cheer
Curt
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Curt Schulze
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Registered
Less
More
- Posts: 1013
- Thank you received: 140
09 Jun 2021 19:18 #43317
by Curt Schulze
The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
Be of Good Cheer
Curt
Replied by Curt Schulze on topic 851 Axle Ratio Stamping
The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
Be of Good Cheer
Curt
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamesbartlett
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Registered
Less
More
- Posts: 23
- Thank you received: 1
08 Jun 2021 22:56 #43314
by jamesbartlett
'35 Auburn S/C Convert. Sedan
'32 Duesenberg D/C Phaeton
851 Axle Ratio Stamping was created by jamesbartlett
Where on the differential is the stamping that shows the pinion and ring gear tooth count? Also, what rear end ratios were available in 851s, both super-charged and non-super-charged? Thanks.
'35 Auburn S/C Convert. Sedan
'32 Duesenberg D/C Phaeton
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.