- Posts: 1
- Thank you received: 0
lawsuit about ownership of a (high price) classic
- landmark
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New User
-
this is not about an ACD car, but an interesting story of the disput about the ownership of a pre-war jewel.
I found the report in the german newsmagazin "Der Spiegel", the story is as follows:
A dutch car collector bought a 1935 Mercedes 500K Roadster at an (pebble-beach) auction in 2011. The price was roundabout $ 3.8 million.
He shipped the car to the Netherlands. In april 2012 he went with the car to the german classic car fair "Techno Classica".
At that fair the car had been confiscated by German authorities. The cause for that was that the heirs (grandchildren) of the first german owner Mr. Hans Friedrich Prym (owner 1935-1945) say that Mr. Prym has not sold the car to a US soldier in 1945, who shipped the car to the USA. The Prym heirs say the car was taken without paying and without a salescontract.
Last week a german court judged that the car is owned by Mr. Prym's heirs and the cartaking in 1945 was unlawful.
I think that would be (by far) not the end of that story and following lawsuits will take years with an open end.
Here is link to the german "Spiegel" report: http://www.spiegel.de/auto/aktuell/proz ... 36516.html
And here an older article about the confiscation in english language: http://www.businessinsider.com/1935-mercedes-2012-4
Matt
Was man besonders gerne tut,
ist selten ganz besonders gut
Wilhelm Busch
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- landmark
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New User
-
- Posts: 1
- Thank you received: 0
that: http://www.rmauctions.com/CarDetails.cf ... &Currency= would be the car, the story is about.
Matt
Was man besonders gerne tut,
ist selten ganz besonders gut
Wilhelm Busch
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- alsancle
-
- Offline
- ACD Club Member
-
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
The problem is at this point there is no reasonable way to tell if a car was stolen/confiscated or legally purchased. Basically a mess. I think it's critical that the claim the car was stolen was made in period and documented and not conjured about by someone's great grandchildren.
I don't know the whole story on this car. I do feel bad for the current owner who has done nothing wrong. Hopefully the whole thing will be sorted out in a reasonable way.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- balinwire
-
- Offline
- Frequent Forum Contributor
-
- Posts: 646
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- balinwire
-
- Offline
- Frequent Forum Contributor
-
- Posts: 646
- Thank you received: 0
http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/07/4m-w ... d%3D168297
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- landmark
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New User
-
- Posts: 1
- Thank you received: 0
balinwire wrote: The court has awarded the car to the heirs as stolen war booty. It just seems that following the ownership of these cars all the way back would be impossible as even the history of the Duesenbergs is cloudy in many cases. HM may be on the hook but they did disclose it "showed up" sometimes in the 70's. Best advice is not to sell or show your car in another country. I have the title for the Ford Museum Cord, I guess it's mine. :+)
http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/07/4m-w ... d%3D168297
Hello Balinwire,
thank you for the link. The last passage of that is interesting. I hope Mr. van Haren gets out of that disaster without to much loss.
Matt
Was man besonders gerne tut,
ist selten ganz besonders gut
Wilhelm Busch
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.